co-authored with D. Arnold and published in Human Rights Quarterly, v. 28, no. 3 (Aug. 2006), pp. 676-700.

Disputes concerning global labor practices are at the core of contemporary debates regarding globalization. Critics have charged multinational enterprises with the unjust exploitation of workers in the developing world.  In response, some economists and “classical liberals” have argued that these criticisms are grounded in a naïve understanding of global economics.  They contend instead that sweatshops constitute an inevitable and essential feature of economic development.  To the contrary, we argue that there are persuasive theoretical and empirical reasons for rejecting the arguments of these defenders of sweatshops.  In particular, we argue that respecting workers entail an obligation to adhere to local labor laws, and we demonstrate that it is feasible for multinational corporations (MNCs) to provide decent working conditions, and to provide a fair wage to workers.  We go on to argue that MNCs have good strategic reasons for embracing voluntary codes of conduct.  The main conclusions of this essay are that there are compelling ethical and strategic reasons for MNCs to voluntarily improve working conditions in their global sweatshops.